top of page
Search

Due Process Requirements in Employee Dismissal: A Step-by-Step Employer Guide

  • Writer: Yasser Aureada
    Yasser Aureada
  • Jun 11
  • 12 min read





Executive Summary


Employee dismissal in the Philippines is not simply a management decision. It is a legal process.


Under Philippine labor law, an employer may terminate an employee only when there is a valid legal ground and the required procedure is followed. This is the essence of due process in employee dismissal.


For employers, due process has two important parts. First, there must be a lawful reason for dismissal. This is called substantive due process. Second, the employer must follow the correct procedure before the termination becomes effective. This is called procedural due process.


A company may have a valid reason to discipline or dismiss an employee, but if it fails to issue the proper notices, give the employee a real opportunity to explain, or document the decision correctly, the dismissal may still be challenged.


This guide explains the due process requirements for employee dismissal in the Philippines in clear, practical language. It is designed for business owners, HR officers, managers, corporate officers, and employers who want to avoid illegal dismissal claims and handle employee termination properly.


Why Due Process Matters in Employee Dismissal


Due process protects both the employee and the employer.


For employees, it ensures that they are not dismissed unfairly, secretly, or without a chance to defend themselves. Employment affects livelihood, reputation, and family security, so the law requires fairness before a person may be removed from work.


For employers, due process creates structure. It helps the company make decisions based on facts, documents, company policy, and law. It also reduces the risk of emotional, rushed, or inconsistent disciplinary action.


When dismissal is handled poorly, the employer may face an illegal dismissal complaint before the labor authorities. If the employee wins, the company may be ordered to pay backwages, separation pay, damages, attorney’s fees, and other monetary claims. In some cases, reinstatement may also be ordered.


A proper due process procedure is not just legal compliance. It is risk management.


Substantive Due Process vs. Procedural Due Process


Before starting any dismissal process, employers must understand the difference between substantive due process and procedural due process.


Substantive due process means there must be a valid legal cause for termination. The employer must be able to prove that the dismissal is based on a just cause or authorized cause recognized by law.


Procedural due process means the employer must follow the proper steps before the dismissal becomes effective. The process depends on whether the termination is based on just cause or authorized cause.


Both are required.

A valid reason without proper procedure can still create liability. A complete procedure without a valid reason will not save an invalid dismissal. Employers must satisfy both the legality of the cause and the legality of the manner of dismissal.


Just Cause vs. Authorized Cause: Why the Difference Matters


Employee dismissal in the Philippines generally falls under two major categories: just causes and authorized causes.


A just cause is based on the employee’s fault, misconduct, negligence, disobedience, dishonesty, or breach of duty. It focuses on what the employee did or failed to do.


An authorized cause is based on business, economic, operational, or health-related reasons. It is not necessarily caused by employee wrongdoing.


This classification matters because the due process requirements are different. Just cause termination generally requires the twin-notice rule and an opportunity to be heard. Authorized cause termination generally requires written notice to both the employee and the Department of Labor and Employment at least 30 days before the effective date of termination.


Employers should not mix the two. Treating a business reorganization as a disciplinary dismissal, or treating employee misconduct as redundancy, can weaken the company’s position and create legal risk.


What Are Just Causes for Dismissal?


Just causes are grounds for termination attributable to the employee’s conduct or fault. Under the Labor Code and implementing rules, these include serious misconduct, willful disobedience, gross and habitual neglect of duties, fraud or willful breach of trust, commission of a crime against the employer or the employer’s representative, and analogous causes.


In simple terms, just cause dismissal may apply when an employee commits a serious violation that makes continued employment improper.


Examples may include theft, falsification of company records, repeated unexplained absences, serious insubordination, violence in the workplace, fraud, or deliberate violation of lawful company rules.


However, employers should be careful. Not every mistake is a just cause for dismissal. The offense must be serious enough to justify termination. The penalty must be proportionate to the violation.


For example, a minor first-time mistake may justify coaching, warning, or suspension, but not necessarily dismissal. A long-serving employee with no prior record may require a more careful evaluation. The employer must consider the nature of the offense, the employee’s role, the damage caused, the employee’s past record, and whether lesser penalties are appropriate.


Due Process for Just Cause Dismissal


For just cause termination, employers generally follow the twin-notice rule.


This means the employer must issue two written notices and give the employee a real opportunity to explain before dismissal is imposed.


Step 1: Conduct a Preliminary Review


Before issuing a notice to explain, the employer should first review the facts.


Management should collect incident reports, attendance records, CCTV footage, emails, messages, audit findings, customer complaints, witness statements, company policies, and prior warnings.


This preliminary review helps the employer avoid issuing vague or unsupported accusations. It also helps determine whether the matter should be handled through coaching, written warning, suspension, or possible dismissal.


The goal is not to decide guilt immediately. The goal is to determine whether there is enough basis to require the employee to explain.


Step 2: Issue the First Written Notice or Notice to Explain


The first written notice is commonly called a Notice to Explain or NTE.


This notice should clearly inform the employee of the specific acts or omissions being charged. It should state the company rule or legal ground involved, the facts supporting the charge, the possible penalty, and the deadline for submitting a written explanation.


A vague notice is risky. A notice that simply says “poor performance,” “loss of trust,” “insubordination,” or “violation of company policy” may not be enough if it does not explain what actually happened.


The employee must be able to understand the accusation and prepare a meaningful response.


Step 3: Give the Employee Enough Time to Respond


The employee should be given a reasonable period to submit a written explanation.


Under DOLE Department Order No. 147-15, the employee should be given ample opportunity to be heard, which means a meaningful chance to answer the charges, submit evidence, or rebut the evidence against them.


Employers should avoid forcing an employee to respond immediately, especially when the allegations are serious or involve documents that need review. A rushed process may appear unfair.


Step 4: Hold a Hearing or Conference When Necessary


A formal trial-type hearing is not always required in every case. However, the employee must still be given a real opportunity to be heard.


A hearing or administrative conference is advisable when the employee requests it, when the facts are disputed, when witness statements must be clarified, when the company needs to ask questions, or when dismissal is being considered.


During the conference, the employee should be allowed to explain, present evidence, ask for clarification, and respond to the allegations. The employer should document what happened through minutes, attendance sheets, written statements, or recordings when legally and properly allowed.


The hearing should not be a mere formality. Management should remain open to the possibility that the employee has a valid explanation.


Step 5: Evaluate the Evidence Objectively


After receiving the employee’s explanation and conducting the hearing if needed, the employer should evaluate the evidence carefully.


The company should ask whether the act was proven, whether the rule was lawful and known to the employee, whether the violation was serious, whether the penalty is proportionate, and whether the employee’s explanation changes the outcome.


The decision should not be based on suspicion, anger, workplace politics, or pressure from management. It should be based on substantial evidence.


In labor cases, substantial evidence means relevant evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion. The employer does not need proof beyond reasonable doubt, but it must have more than speculation.


Step 6: Issue the Second Written Notice or Notice of Decision


If the employer decides to dismiss the employee, it must issue a second written notice.


The notice of decision should state the facts considered, the rule or legal ground violated, the employee’s explanation, the reason the explanation was accepted or rejected, the penalty imposed, and the effective date of termination.


This notice should be professional and factual. It should avoid insulting language, emotional statements, or unnecessary accusations.


The second notice is important because it shows that the employer did not decide the case before hearing the employee. It also becomes a key document if the dismissal is later challenged.


Due Process for Authorized Cause Dismissal


Authorized cause dismissal follows a different process.


The employee is not being dismissed because of misconduct. Instead, the termination is based on business or health-related reasons recognized by law, such as redundancy, retrenchment, installation of labor-saving devices, closure or cessation of business, or disease.


For authorized causes, the employer must generally serve written notices to the employee and DOLE at least 30 days before the intended date of termination.


Step 1: Identify the Authorized Cause


The employer must first identify the correct authorized cause.


Redundancy exists when a position becomes unnecessary or superfluous.


Retrenchment is used to prevent or minimize business losses. Closure involves shutting down the business or part of the business. Installation of labor-saving devices involves replacing labor with machinery, technology, or process improvements. Disease applies when the employee’s continued employment is prohibited by law or prejudicial to health, subject to medical certification requirements.


The employer must be accurate. Calling a termination “redundancy” when the real reason is poor performance may create legal problems.


Step 2: Prepare Supporting Documents


Authorized cause dismissal must be supported by evidence.


For redundancy, this may include organizational charts, staffing studies, board approvals, restructuring plans, position reviews, and selection criteria.


For retrenchment, the employer should prepare financial statements, loss reports, cost-saving plans, business projections, and documents showing that retrenchment is necessary to prevent losses.


For closure, the employer should document the business decision, closure plan, permits, notices, and financial or operational reasons.


For disease, the employer must comply with the medical certification requirements under applicable labor rules.


Step 3: Apply Fair and Reasonable Criteria


When only some employees will be affected, the employer should apply fair and reasonable criteria in selecting who will be terminated.


Common criteria may include efficiency, performance, seniority, skills, position necessity, disciplinary record, and business needs.


The criteria must not be discriminatory. The employer should avoid choosing employees based on union activity, pregnancy, age, disability, personal dislike, complaints filed, or other unlawful reasons.


Step 4: Serve the 30-Day Written Notices


The employer must give written notice to the affected employee and to DOLE at least 30 days before the effective date of termination.


The notice should clearly state the authorized cause, the reason for termination, the effective date, and the basis for selecting the affected employee.


This notice period gives the employee time to prepare and gives DOLE notice of the employer’s action.


Step 5: Pay Separation Pay When Required


Separation pay is generally required for authorized cause termination, except in certain cases such as closure due to serious business losses.


The amount depends on the specific authorized cause. For example, redundancy and installation of labor-saving devices generally have different separation pay implications from retrenchment or closure not due to serious losses.


Employers should compute separation pay carefully based on law, contract, company policy, and any applicable collective bargaining agreement.


Due Process for Probationary Employees


Probationary employees also have rights.


An employer may terminate a probationary employee for just cause, authorized cause, or failure to meet reasonable standards made known to the employee at the time of engagement.


This means the employer should clearly communicate performance standards at the start of employment. If the employee fails to meet those standards, the employer should document the performance gaps and issue the required notice before the end of the probationary period.


A common mistake is treating probationary employees as if they may be dismissed anytime without explanation. That is risky. Probationary employment gives the employer an evaluation period, but it does not remove the requirement of fairness and lawful cause.


Due Process for Poor Performance


Poor performance cases require careful handling because they are often disputed.

The employer should show that the employee knew the performance standards, failed to meet them, received feedback or evaluation, and was given a fair opportunity to improve when appropriate.


Performance standards should be reasonable, measurable, and related to the job. The employer should avoid using vague expectations that were never communicated.


For example, if an employee is dismissed for failing to meet sales targets, the company should show the targets, the period covered, the employee’s actual performance, prior coaching or warnings, and any explanation given by the employee.


Poor performance should be documented before it becomes a termination case.


Common Employer Mistakes in Employee Dismissal


One of the most common mistakes is immediate termination. Employers sometimes dismiss an employee on the same day an incident occurs. This may feel efficient, but it often violates due process.


Another mistake is issuing a vague notice to explain. If the employee does not understand the specific charge, the opportunity to explain becomes meaningless.


Employers also make mistakes when they decide the outcome before the employee responds. Due process requires an open and fair evaluation.


Another common error is failing to document evidence. In labor cases, the employer has the burden to prove that dismissal was valid. Without documents, the company may struggle to defend its decision.


For authorized causes, employers often fail to send the required notice to DOLE or fail to prove that redundancy, retrenchment, or closure was real and done in good faith.


Risks and Penalties for Failure to Observe Due Process


Failure to observe due process can be costly.


If there is no valid cause for dismissal, the termination may be declared illegal. The employer may be ordered to reinstate the employee and pay full backwages, allowances, benefits, damages, attorney’s fees, and other amounts.


If there is a valid cause but the employer failed to follow procedural due process, the employer may still be held liable for nominal damages.


This distinction matters. A valid reason does not excuse a defective process. Employers should treat procedure seriously even when the misconduct appears obvious.


Termination decisions also carry reputational and operational risks. A poorly handled dismissal can affect employee morale, trigger complaints, weaken management credibility, and create avoidable litigation.


Practical Examples


Example 1: Theft of Company Property


An employee is suspected of taking company property. The company has CCTV footage and inventory records.


The employer should first review the evidence, issue a notice to explain, give the employee time to respond, conduct a conference if needed, and then issue a decision based on the evidence.


Even serious misconduct requires due process.


Example 2: Repeated Absences Without Notice


An employee repeatedly fails to report for work and does not provide valid explanation.

The employer should review attendance records, prior warnings, leave policies, and communications. If the absences may justify dismissal, the employer should still issue the required notices and allow the employee to explain.


Example 3: Redundancy Due to Reorganization


A company removes duplicate positions after restructuring its departments.


The employer should prepare a redundancy plan, apply fair selection criteria, issue 30-day notices to the affected employees and DOLE, and pay the required separation pay.


The company must be able to show that the redundancy is genuine and not a disguise for dismissing a particular employee.


Example 4: Poor Performance


An employee consistently fails to meet reasonable performance standards.


The employer should show that the standards were communicated, the employee failed to meet them, and the company gave feedback or evaluation. If termination becomes necessary, the employer should follow the proper notice and decision process.


Frequently Asked Questions


Can an employer dismiss an employee immediately?


Generally, no. Even when there is a serious violation, the employer must still follow due process. Immediate dismissal without notice and opportunity to be heard may expose the employer to legal liability.


What is the twin-notice rule?


The twin-notice rule applies to just cause termination. The first notice informs the employee of the charge and gives the employee a chance to explain. The second notice states the employer’s decision after considering the explanation and evidence.


Is a hearing always required?


A formal trial-type hearing is not always required. However, the employee must be given a meaningful opportunity to be heard. A hearing or conference is advisable when facts are disputed or dismissal is being considered.


What is the difference between just cause and authorized cause?


Just cause is based on employee fault, such as misconduct, fraud, disobedience, or gross neglect. Authorized cause is based on business or health-related reasons, such as redundancy, retrenchment, closure, labor-saving devices, or disease.


Does failure to follow due process automatically make dismissal illegal?


If there is no valid cause, the dismissal may be illegal. If there is a valid cause but the employer failed to follow procedure, the employer may still be liable for procedural due process violations, including nominal damages.


Does a probationary employee have due process rights?


Yes. A probationary employee may be dismissed for just cause, authorized cause, or failure to meet reasonable standards made known at the time of hiring. The employer should still act fairly and document the basis for termination.


Should employers consult a lawyer before dismissing an employee?


Yes, especially when dismissal may involve serious misconduct, long-term employees, managerial employees, redundancy, retrenchment, closure, disease, union activity, protected employee rights, or possible labor disputes.


Call-to-Action


Due process in employee dismissal is not a technicality. It is the foundation of a valid and defensible termination.


Before dismissing an employee, employers should confirm the legal ground, review the evidence, issue proper notices, give the employee a fair chance to explain, document the decision, and settle all final pay and benefits correctly.


Aureada CPA Law Firm assists employers with employee dismissal procedures, notices to explain, administrative hearings, termination decisions, redundancy and retrenchment planning, labor compliance audits, settlement documents, and labor dispute prevention.


If your company is handling a sensitive employee dismissal, seek legal guidance before making the final decision. A careful process today can prevent a costly labor dispute tomorrow.

 
 
 

Comments


© 2026 by Aureada CPA Law Firm.

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
bottom of page